lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] serial: omap: Fix IRQ handling return value
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Greg,
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
> > +Felipe
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
> > <oleksandr.savchenko@ti.com> wrote:
> >> From: Ruchika Kharwar <ruchika@ti.com>
> >>
> >> Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
> >> IRQ_NONE.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED, this patch will surely break
> > systems where the UART IRQ is shared with other platforms.
> >
> > I just noticed this patch when bisecting a related problem. Why
> > wasn't this Cc'd to linux-omap where OMAP users might have been more
> > likely to see it?
> >
> > Greg, without a better justification in the changelog, I think this
> > patch should be dropped from tty-next.
>
> Can you drop this from tty-next please?
>
> The authors aren't responding (one of the ti.com addresses bounced)
> and this "fix" is most is not correct.

Yes, sorry, behind on my pending tty patch queue. I'll try to get to it
this week.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-27 20:01    [W:0.597 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site