Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:29:52 +0530 | Subject | Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy? | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 26 August 2013 20:53, Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@gmail.com> wrote: > So far as I know, it stores some user's config and cpufreq_update_policy() > bases on the data in the struct to start a new policy. Cpu thermal driver > (/driver/thermal/cpu_cooling.c)also will its value to update freq policy > when receive a cpufreq policy adjust notification.
Yeah, but how are these different from policy->min/max/policy/governor? Why do we need to replicate this information? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |