Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:07:42 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] idr: Use this_cpu_ptr() for percpu_ida |
| |
Hello, Kent.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:01:32PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > I think Tejun and I might be at a bit of an impasse with the ida rewrite > itself, but I don't think there were any outstanding objections to the > percpu ida code itself - and this is a standalone version.
The percpu ida code can be applied separately from the ida rewrite?
> I was meaning to ask you Andrew, if you could take a look at the ida > discussion and lend your opinion - I don't think there's any _specific_ > technical objections left to my ida code, and it's now on a more > philisophical "complexity vs. ..." level.
Hmmm... the objection was pretty specific - don't depend on high-order or vmalloc allocations when it can be easily avoided by using proper radix tree.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |