Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: ACPI vs Device Tree - moving forward | Date | Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:29:45 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:11:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:26:50 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: > > This conversation seems to have pretty much entirely ended up happening > > on ksummit-discuss, which doesn't seem that useful. So let's have > > another go with a wider audience (and where I don't have to sign up for > > yet another mailing list...)
[...]
> > In any case, it seems like this is something that should be discussed. A > > bunch of people in the earlier discussion mentioned that they were going > > to be in New Orleans, so I'd suggest that we arrange a time for > > in-person discussion there. That should give us a solid basis for > > further mailing list discussion, and then there'll be another > > opportunity for discussion in Edinburgh. > > There is a time slot reserved for the second part of the ACPI/PM+PCI uconf > that may be used for this purpose if it's suitable for all of the interested > people. It is scheduled at 2 PM on Thursday, September 19 at the moment > (concurrently with the containers uconf).
OK, so for the information of everyone interested, the discussion in New Orleans is now officially on the LPC's ACPI/PM+PCI uconf agenda and tentatively scheduled in the time slot mentioned above.
Thanks, Rafael
| |