Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:39:31 +0300 | From | Grygorii Strashko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack |
| |
On 08/19/2013 03:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > >>> Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I >>> wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out >>> of the loop, I mean. > > Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and > Felipe to -next. Thanks!
Thanks.
> >> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap, >> and will need the same change. > > Somebody up for this? >
Regards, -grygorii
| |