lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel summit 2013: Call for Hobbyists
On 08/18/2013 03:26:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Francois Romieu
> <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> wrote:
> > As a hobbyist, I have less time than most pro and must cope with
> > whatever brain juice remains after the paid work. It doesn't make me
>
> Indeed. And the dosing of brain juice is not always aligned with the
> steady
> pace of Linux kernel development, causing hobyists to miss merge
> windows,
> resubmissions, and general follow-up.

And those of us who don't have "follow linux-kernel" as part of a day
job's responsibilities tend to be several days behind, so it's hard to
participate in coversations.

I seldom get paid to work on a current kernel. I _have_ been paid to
beat some horrible vendor board support package with a rock until it
sticks to the hardware, but this is invariably multiple years behind
current and has a lineage like "vanilla kernel, forked by android for
ice cream sandwich, then forked by TI's Netra Board Support Package,
then forked by Polycom because implementing Skype in hardware seemed
like a good idea at the time". (My last contract involved Centos 6.3, a
fresh release with a 4 year old kernel. Lots of backporting stuff from
~3.4 to 2.6.32 or whatever it was using. Because that's when what I
needed was feature complete and there were fewer API changes than
current, that's why.)

I do sometimes get to chip bits off and port them to upstream, after
the fact, if there's time, and if my boss can shield the effort from
every legal department's ironclad desire to do the absolute minimum
required and no more. Usually there's just a nominal source tarball
snapshot (no source control history, that's confidential) posted to
some obscure website when the hardware finally ships (and the dev
team's broken up), and if you _do_ diff this obsolete thing against
vanilla the diff is multiple megabytes and most of it wasn't our
changes.

Intermittently getting paid to do that means I _don't_ qualify as a
hobbyist, apparently. Even though the vast majority of actual open
soruce programming I get done is in the downtime _between_ contracts.

(I'm listed in MAINTAINERS for trying to prevent documentation from
falling through the cracks when nobody else merges it through their
tree. I got paid to work on Linux documentation once, for a very nice 6
months back in 2007, but I didn't get listed in MAINTAINERS until ~3
years after that stopped.)

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-20 13:21    [W:1.164 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site