Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [Patch net-next v2 8/8] selinux: use generic union inet_addr | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400
> On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote: >> From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> >> >> selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr, >> it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too. >> >> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> >> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> >> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> >> Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> > > Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he > wasn't going to merge these patches?
I didn't like how he added completely unused bloat to various datastructures because he unconditionally put a port field into there.
He removed that problem this time, but there are still a lot of things I don't like about this patch series.
| |