lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion
Hi Mel,

On 08/16/2013 04:33 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> I already said I recognise it has a large number of users in the field
> and users count a lot more than me complaining. If it gets promoted then
> I expect it will be on those grounds.
>
> My position is that I think it's a bad idea because it is clear there is no
> plan or intention of ever brining zram and zswap together. Instead we are
> to have two features providing similar functionality with zram diverging
> further from zswap. Ultimately I believe this will increase maintenance
> headaches. It'll get even more entertaining if/when someone ever tries
> to reimplement zcache although since Dan left I do not believe anyone is
> planning to try. I will not be acking this series but there many be enough

I already reimplemented zcache based on mm/zbud.c.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/104824

I'll pay more attention to the problems of zswap as you mentioned.

> developers that are actually willing to maintain a duel zram/zswap mess
> to make it happen anyway.
>

--
Regards,
-Bob


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-16 11:21    [W:0.062 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site