lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 3/3] spmi: document the PMIC arbiter SPMI bindings
From
Date

On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:

> Hey Kumar-
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:53:27PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.txt
>>
>> As this is a qcom specific binding, I think the file name should be msm-spmi-pmic-arb.txt or something like that.
>
> Agreed. It might be nice to use a vendor prefix in the name too. How's qcom,msm-pmic-arb.txt sound?

Sounds good, as I see we have other examples of having a comma in file names for bindings.

- k

--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-17 08:01    [W:0.075 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site