Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:17:06 +0200 | From | Benoit Cousson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as a separate dtsi file |
| |
Hi Uri,
On 16/08/2013 14:30, Uri Yosef wrote: > Hi, > > I am on vacation until Aug 25th, I will test it when I back.
OK, but it will be too late for this merge window. I'll drop it for 3.12 then.
Thanks, Benoit
> > Regards, > Uri Yosef > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@ti.com > <mailto:ruslan.bilovol@ti.com>> wrote: > > Hi Benoit, > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 <tel:2013> at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson > <bcousson@baylibre.com <mailto:bcousson@baylibre.com>> wrote: > > Hi Ruslan, > > > > On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just > >> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed > >> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as > >> SDP4430 board > > > > > > The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test > for Panda > > and Variscite boards before merging it. > > Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I > resubmit this series with > fixed commit message? > However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not > own any such board so > you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri? > > > > > Regards, > > Benoit > > -- > Best regards, > Ruslan Bilvol > >
| |