lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] preempt_count rework
On 08/14/2013 08:39 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> ..so could the rq = cpu_rq(cpu) sequence be improved cycle expenditure
> wise by squirreling rq pointer away in a percpu this_rq, and replacing
> cpu_rq(cpu) above with a __this_cpu_read(this_rq) version of this_rq()?
>

Yes.

-hpa




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-14 18:01    [W:0.099 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site