[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] per-cpu preempt_count
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:56:37PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED could be made the high bit - or maybe an even simpler
> solution is to invert its meaning: making '0' the "it needs to resched!"
> case, so the check would be decl+jz?

Right, inverted NEED_RESCHED would work.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-13 18:41    [W:0.334 / U:1.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site