Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/3] Pin page control subsystem | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> | Date | Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:46:42 +0200 |
| |
Hi Minchan,
On wto, 2013-08-13 at 16:04 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > patch 2 introduce pinpage control > subsystem. So, subsystems want to control pinpage should implement own > pinpage_xxx functions because each subsystem would have other character > so what kinds of data structure for managing pinpage information depends > on them. Otherwise, they can use general functions defined in pinpage > subsystem. patch 3 hacks migration.c so that migration is > aware of pinpage now and migrate them with pinpage subsystem.
I wonder why don't we use page->mapping and a_ops? Is there any disadvantage of such mapping/a_ops?
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |