lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
On 07/29/13 15:00, Kumar Gala wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..dbd9a69
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
> + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
> +
> +#define SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC 1

Is this id only for the apps processor? What about hexagon? Does it need
a different number?

> +#define BASE_ID 0
> +
> +static int msm_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC, lock_addr);
> + smp_mb();
> + return readl_relaxed(lock_addr) == SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC;
> +}
> +
> +static void msm_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + int lock_owner;

This should probably be u32 to be explicit about the size of the register.

> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
> +
> + lock_owner = readl_relaxed(lock_addr);
> + if (lock_owner != SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC) {
> + pr_err("%s: spinlock not owned by Apps (actual owner is %d)\n",

Maybe you should just say "spinlock not owned by us (actual owner is
%d)" so that this driver is agnostic to the processor it runs on?

> + __func__, lock_owner);
> + }
> +
> + writel_relaxed(0, lock_addr);
> + smp_mb();
> +}
>

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-13 00:21    [W:0.060 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site