[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Enable arm_global_timer for Zynq brakes boot
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>>>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
>>>>> never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this
>>>>> case properly IMHO.
>>>> If you have a per-cpu tick device that isn't suffering from
>>>> FEAT_C3_STOP why wouldn't you use that for the tick versus a
>>>> per-cpu tick device that has FEAT_C3_STOP? It sounds like there
>>>> is a bug in the preference logic or you should boost the rating
>>>> of the arm global timer above the twd. Does this patch help? It
>>>> should make the arm global timer the tick device and whatever the
>>>> cadence timer you have into the broadcast device.
>>> I finally got to test your patch. Unfortunately, it makes the system
>>> hang even earlier:
>> Sorry it had a bug depending on the registration order. Can you try this
>> one (tabs are probably spaces, sorry)? I will go read through this
>> thread to see if we already covered the registration order.
> That did it! Booted straight into the system.

Good news :)

> The broadcast device is
> the TTC instead of GT, now.
> Tick Device: mode: 1
> Broadcast device
> Clock Event Device: ttc_clockevent
> max_delta_ns: 1207932479
> min_delta_ns: 18432
> mult: 233015
> shift: 32
> mode: 1
> next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs
> set_next_event: ttc_set_next_event
> set_mode: ttc_set_mode
> event_handler: tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
> retries: 0
> tick_broadcast_mask: 00000000
> tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000

At the first glance, the timer broadcast usage is not set, right ? Can
you try with the cpuidle flag even if it is not needed ?

-- Daniel

<> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <> Facebook |
<!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<> Blog

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-12 19:21    [W:0.105 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site