lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] perf: add ability to sample physical data addresses
From
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/30/13 8:21 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>
>> One thing that bothers me with the MMAP2 approach is that
>> it forces integration into perf. Now, you will need to analyze
>> the MMAP2 records. With my sample_type approach, you
>> simply needed a cmdline option on perf record, and then
>> you could dump the sample using perf report -D and feed
>
>
> what do you want that is not coming out via perf-script?
>
mmap records. Are they passed to scripts?

>
>> them into a post-processing script. But now, the analysis
>> needs to be integrated into perf or the tool needs to parse
>> the full perf.data file.
>
>
> you mean parsed during perf-record?
>
No, I mean for a standalone tool on top of perf record.
With my approach, you can simply write a wrapper script
around perf report and do the analysis.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-30 17:21    [W:0.051 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site