[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Remove extra variables
On 30 July 2013 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki <> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 07:06:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage
>> refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to
>> capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure
>> cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine.
>> Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear.
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <>
> Both [1-2/2] look good, but what do they apply to? Mainline, linux-next,
> my bleeding-edge branch?

Sorry for not mentioning this, bleeding-edge :)

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-30 16:01    [W:0.037 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site