lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:

> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> > > This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work
> > > is complementary to Mel's work with numa faulting.
> >
> > I highly dislike the use of task weights here. It seems completely
> > unrelated to the problem at hand.
>
> I also don't particularly like the fact that it's purely process based.
> The faults information we have gives much richer task relations.
>

Peter,

Can you please suggest workloads that I could try which might showcase
why you hate pure process based approach?

I know numa02_SMT does regress with my patches but I think its most
my implementation fault and not a approach issue.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-30 11:41    [W:0.080 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site