Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:30:08 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts |
| |
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > Before answering please think about the relevance of your statements > > "getting this all right isn't easy", "something like a scheduler", > > "users probably want ..." and "stable /dev/disk/by-id/* symlinks" in > > those contexts. > > I don't think anybody needs your money.
Thanks for your well thought out technical argument.
> But it's sure an improvement over last time when you wanted to use a > "Kantholz" to make your statement.
Using an out of context snippet from a private conversation at the bar to answer a technical argument is definitely proving your point.
Thanks,
tglx
| |