lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
From
Date

On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..ddd6889
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
>
> Maybe this should go under a new hwspinlock directory?

Will look for Ohad to comment on this.

>
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>>> +Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex Block:
>>> +
>>> +The hardware block provides mutexes utilized between different processors
>>> +on the SoC as part of the communication protocol used by these processors.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex"
>>> +- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers
>>> +- reg-names:
>>> + "mutex-base" - string to identify mutex registers
>>> +- qcom,num-locks: the number of locks/mutexes supported
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + qcom,tcsr-mutex@fd484000 {
>
> Maybe it should be hw-mutex@fd484000?

again, will look for Ohad to make some comment on this.

>>> + compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
>>> + reg = <0xfd484000 0x1000>;
>>> + reg-names = "mutex-base";
>>> + qcom,num-locks = <32>;
>>> + };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..c7d80c5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>>> + *
>>> + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
>>> + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
>>> + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>
> <linux/io.h> please.

will change, I choice <asm/io.h> since *_relaxed are arm specific.

>>> +
>>> +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
>>> +
>>> +#define SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC 1
>>> +#define BASE_ID 0
>>> +
>>> +static int msm_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>>> +{
>>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>>> +
>>> + writel_relaxed(SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC, lock_addr);
>>> + smp_mb();
>
> Are you sure you don't want mb() instead? What is this barrier
> for? Comment please.

Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.

>>> + return readl_relaxed(lock_addr) == SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void msm_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>>> +{
>>> + int lock_owner;
>>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>>> +
>>> + lock_owner = readl_relaxed(lock_addr);
>>> + if (lock_owner != SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: spinlock not owned by Apps (actual owner is %d)\n",
>>> + __func__, lock_owner);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + writel_relaxed(0, lock_addr);
>>> + smp_mb();
>
> Same here. What is smp_mb() for?

Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.

>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct hwspinlock_ops msm_hwspinlock_ops = {
>>> + .trylock = msm_hwspinlock_trylock,
>>> + .unlock = msm_hwspinlock_unlock,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct of_device_id msm_hwspinlock_of_match[];
>
> Why not just put the match table here then? Also, can it be
> const?

Will change and make const

>
>>> +static int msm_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret, i, stride;
>>> + u32 num_locks;
>>> + struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
>>> + struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> + void __iomem *iobase;
>>> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>>> +
>>> + match = of_match_device(msm_hwspinlock_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>>> + if (!match)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,num-locks", &num_locks);
>>> + if (ret || (num_locks == 0))
>
> Drop useless ().

done

>
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mutex-base");
>>> + iobase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(iobase))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(iobase);
>>> +
>>> + bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> + sizeof(*bank) + num_locks * sizeof(*hwlock), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!bank)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>
> Style Nit: Maybe we could grow a local variable to get this to be
> one line.
>
> size_t array_size;
>
> array_size = num_lock * sizeof(*hwlock);
> bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bank) + array_size, GFP_KERNEL);

done

- k

>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-30 00:21    [W:0.153 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site