| Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:56:53 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > index 9ae1871..175172d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = { > &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs, > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
Use ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW instead.
> + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs, > +#endif > NULL, > }; > > @@ -332,6 +335,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW > + exynos_driver.boost_supported = true; > +#endif
So, why here and not in the definition of exynos_driver?
> register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb); > > if (cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) { > -- > 1.7.10.4 >
|