Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:21:35 -0400 | From | Eduardo Valentin <> | Subject | Re: RFC: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes |
| |
On 25-07-2013 12:38, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: >>> Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to >>> have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we >>> would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is >>> monitored and what is used for monitoring. >> >> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my >> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it), > > What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a > device node :-) >
ahh ok.. I see.
> Pawel > > > >
-- You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |