lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] tools, perf: Add a precise event qualifier v2
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:39:09PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 06:51 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:27:43PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I hate having to justify why breaking the ABI is unacceptable.
> >Well it's a testing ABI, so we can do changes to it.
>
> The testing ABI has a simple policy about changes:
>
> The interface can be changed to add new features, but the
> current interface will not break by doing this, unless grave
> errors or security problems are found in them.
>
> It's probably fine to change a testing ABI once in a while, but when things
> like trinity start breaking that often due to ABI changes in the same exact
> place, that's too much IMO.

It sounds like trinity is breaking (well printing a message, not really
breaking) on any addition. So if we follow that the perf sysfs interface
would be completely frozen and can never be extended over today.

I don't think it's a big problem that a test tool needs to be extended
when the software it's testing changes.

If there are enough other widely used programs that actually break from
additions probably would need a v2 of the sysfs interface for extensions
(with new file or directory names), and keep v1 frozen for
compatibility.

But I don't think that's the case today?

-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-24 04:01    [W:0.106 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site