lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Performance regression from switching lock to rw-sem for anon-vma tree
    On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:45:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > Why not just try the delayed addition approach first? The spinning is time
    > limited AFAICS, so we don't _have to_ recognize those as writers per se,
    > only if the spinning fails and it wants to go on the waitlist. Am I
    > missing something?
    >
    > It will change patterns, it might even change the fairness balance - but
    > is a legit change otherwise, especially if it helps performance.

    Be very careful here. Some people (XFS) have very specific needs. Walken
    and dchinner had a longish discussion on this a while back.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-23 12:41    [W:3.673 / U:0.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site