Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:53:53 +0200 | From | "Arend van Spriel" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/22] ARM: dts: bcm281xx: Remove '0x's from BCM11351 BRT DTS file |
| |
On 07/22/2013 03:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Christian Daudt wrote: > >> On 13-07-22 03:52 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> Cc: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts >>> index 67ec524..fdace5d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts >>> @@ -27,18 +27,18 @@ >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> - sdio0: sdio@0x3f180000 { >>> + sdio0: sdio@3f180000 { >>> max-frequency = <48000000>; >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> - sdio1: sdio@0x3f190000 { >>> + sdio1: sdio@3f190000 { >>> non-removable; >>> max-frequency = <48000000>; >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> - sdio3: sdio@0x3f1b0000 { >>> + sdio3: sdio@3f1b0000 { >>> max-frequency = <48000000>; >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >> Hi Lee, >> Is this convention documented ? Someone called my attention to the >> fact that this dts files was inconsistent in its use of 0x in names, >> but I was not aware of a coding guideline for this. > > The best two places I can think of are: > > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt > and > http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
And even those do not stick to a single convention, but that is what can be expected of a twiki page :-p
Regards, Arend
| |