lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review
    Date
    On 07/19/2013 05:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
    >>> On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    >>>> ---------------
    >>>> Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing.
    >>>> Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible.
    >>>> ---------------
    >>>>
    >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release.
    >>>> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
    >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    >>>> let me know.
    >>>>
    >>>> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013.
    >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
    >>>>
    >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz
    >>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
    >>>>
    >>>> thanks,
    >>>>
    >>>> greg k-h
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Greg,
    >>>
    >>> Build failed with the following error:
    >>>
    >>> LD ipc/built-in.o
    >>> CC [M] fs/cifs/inode.o
    >>> fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’:
    >>> fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function
    >>> ‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    >>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
    >>> make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
    >>> make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
    >>> make: *** [fs] Error 2
    >>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    >>> CC security/selinux/hooks.o
    >>>
    >>> I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled.
    >>> cifs_dbg() is not defined.
    >>
    >> Ugh, I thought I fixed that one... I did it for the 3.4 and other
    >> trees, I'll go see what I did wrong...
    >
    > Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when
    > I tried it again, it failed. Before it wasn't, odd...
    >
    > Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at:
    > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz
    >
    > If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do
    > anything stupid with this one too.
    >
    > Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was
    > not a good review cycle...
    >
    > thanks,
    >
    > greg k-h
    >

    Greg,

    rc2 compiled on x86-64. I will run cross-compile tests and boot tests
    later on today or tomorrow morning and report the results.

    -- Shuah

    Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research
    America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-20 02:41    [W:4.042 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site