lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] usb: gadget: USB_GADGET should depend on HAS_DMA
Date
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> writes:

> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> If NO_DMA=y:
>>
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `dma_set_coherent_mask':
>> include/linux/dma-mapping.h:93: undefined reference to `dma_supported'
>> include/linux/dma-mapping.h:93: undefined reference to `dma_supported'
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `usb_gadget_unmap_request':
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:91: undefined reference to `dma_unmap_sg'
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:96: undefined reference to `dma_unmap_single'
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `usb_gadget_map_request':
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:62: undefined reference to `dma_map_sg'
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:71: undefined reference to `dma_map_single'
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:74: undefined reference to `dma_mapping_error'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>> ---
>> This one is very debatable: probably the parts using the DMA API should
>> be factored out, instead of disabling the whole USB gadget subsystem.
>
> Indeed. How does this look instead?

This one is much better. FWIW,

Acked-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>

Regards,
--
Alex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-12 10:21    [W:0.065 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site