lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume
On 07/11/2013 07:33 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2013/7/11 Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:

>> I tried to address all these in this patch, but you found yet another serious
>> loop-hole. I guess I'm out of ideas now... if anybody has any thoughts on how
>> to get this right, then I'm all ears. Else, we'll just revert the original
>> commit like Rafael suggested and leave it upto userspace to save and restore
>> the permissions across suspend/resume if it wants ;-(
>>
>
> How about implement scaling driver's suspend/resume callback()? Although this
> needs to be dealt with case by case. If one's callbacks hasn't been implemented,
> it would have to follow current rule.
>

Well, I'm now trying a slightly different approach at reorganizing the code,
and so far I think I'll be able to get it right this time. Let's see how it goes.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-11 17:41    [W:0.381 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site