Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:54:36 +0530 | From | "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume |
| |
On 07/11/2013 07:33 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > 2013/7/11 Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>> I tried to address all these in this patch, but you found yet another serious >> loop-hole. I guess I'm out of ideas now... if anybody has any thoughts on how >> to get this right, then I'm all ears. Else, we'll just revert the original >> commit like Rafael suggested and leave it upto userspace to save and restore >> the permissions across suspend/resume if it wants ;-( >> > > How about implement scaling driver's suspend/resume callback()? Although this > needs to be dealt with case by case. If one's callbacks hasn't been implemented, > it would have to follow current rule. >
Well, I'm now trying a slightly different approach at reorganizing the code, and so far I think I'll be able to get it right this time. Let's see how it goes.
Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat
| |