Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:34:21 -0500 | From | Nishanth Menon <> | Subject | Re: [-next PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP5: fix build breakage due to SCU usage |
| |
Tony,
Any chance of picking these up?
I see that next-20130701 is broke as well in an OMAP5 only build. beyond the fixes already merged in - the missing series seems to be the $subject series to allow an OMAP5 only build.
On 06/26/2013 09:39 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Hi, > > Cortex-A15 based OMAP5 does not use Snoop Control Unit(SCU)[1]. > However, there is lot of code that is shared between Cortex-A9 based > OMAP4 and OMAP5, hence functionality code is shared with runtime usage > of SCU based on SoC worked on. However on building with OMAP5 only > generates the following errors: > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `scu_gp_set': > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep44xx.S:132: undefined reference to `scu_power_mode' > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `scu_gp_clear': > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep44xx.S:229: undefined reference to `scu_power_mode' > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_smp_init_cpus': > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smp.c:185: undefined reference to `scu_get_core_count' > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_smp_prepare_cpus': > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smp.c:211: undefined reference to `scu_enable' > > This was attempted to be "fixed" in various attempts in the past [2] [3]. > > This series applies on top of the other fixes in discussion for linux-next [4] [5]. > > Based on: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git next-20130626 > > Nishanth Menon (2): > ARM: OMAP4: sleep: build OMAP4 specific functions only for OMAP4 > ARM: scu: provide inline dummy functions when SCU is not present > > arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h | 13 ++++++++++++- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep44xx.S | 6 +++++- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0407e/CHDFJICC.html > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2568091/ > [3] http://marc.info/?t=137120115400001&r=1&w=2 > [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/178209.html > [5] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2781471/ > > Regards, > Nishanth Menon >
-- Regards, Nishanth Menon
| |