lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
    luke.leighton wrote:
    > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström
    > <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
    >> tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton:
    >>
    >>> > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and
    >>> > integrated in device probing. Allwinner need to hack every driver used
    >>> > to add their gpio requests to have pinmuxing triggered.
    >>>
    >>> augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here?
    >>
    >> What I said before.
    >
    > idea: hook into devicetree gpio functions to allow script-fex gpio
    > functions to gain access in a separate module? that sort of thing.
    >
    >> Go with DT for the kernel. There is no need for two configuration
    >> mechanisms doing the same thing. Disguise it in fex form (and
    >> translator) if too hard for people with a DOS editior to configure.
    >
    > what methods for doing that. i need proposals. 4 days on the clock.

    4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel
    community work?


    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-06-06 15:21    [W:4.097 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site