Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:12:11 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 4 June 2013 20:36, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote: > On 06/04/2013 08:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Should this be done in 3/3 ? >> > > acpi-cpufreq does not use mperf after 2/3. Why should we compile it with > CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ? > Do you want me to move the change in 3/3?
I somehow feel now that 3/3 should come before 2/3 and then this change should be merged into it. And at the end we can have this patch as 3/3..
What do you say? core should go last and users/drivers must go first.
| |