lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/6] staging: android: binder: fix binder interface for 64bit compat layer
On 05/06/13 00:58, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Serban Constantinescu
> <Serban.Constantinescu@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 22:41, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Serban Constantinescu
>>> <serban.constantinescu@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The changes in this patch will fix the binder interface for use on 64bit
>>>> machines and stand as the base of the 64bit compat support. The changes
>>>> apply to the structures that are passed between the kernel and
>>>> userspace.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the changes applied mirror the change to struct binder_version
>>>> where there is no need for a 64bit wide protocol_version(on 64bit
>>>> machines). The change inlines with the existing 32bit userspace(the
>>>> structure has the same size) and simplifies the compat layer such that
>>>> the same handler can service the BINDER_VERSION ioctl.
>>>>
>>>> Other changes make use of kernel types as well as user-exportable ones
>>>> and fix format specifier issues.
>>>>
>>>> The changes do not affect existing 32bit ABI.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/staging/android/binder.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>> drivers/staging/android/binder.h | 8 ++++----
>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
>>>> index ce70909..ca79084 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
>>>> @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static void
>>>> binder_transaction_buffer_release(struct binder_proc *proc,
>>>> case BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE: {
>>>> struct binder_ref *ref = binder_get_ref(proc,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> if (ref == NULL) {
>>>> - pr_err("transaction release %d bad handle
>>>> %ld\n",
>>>> + pr_err("transaction release %d bad handle
>>>> %d\n",
>>>> debug_id, fp->handle);
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1283,13 +1283,13 @@ static void
>>>> binder_transaction_buffer_release(struct binder_proc *proc,
>>>>
>>>> case BINDER_TYPE_FD:
>>>> binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_TRANSACTION,
>>>> - " fd %ld\n", fp->handle);
>>>> + " fd %d\n", fp->handle);
>>>> if (failed_at)
>>>> task_close_fd(proc, fp->handle);
>>>> break;
>>>>
>>>> default:
>>>> - pr_err("transaction release %d bad object type
>>>> %lx\n",
>>>> + pr_err("transaction release %d bad object type
>>>> %x\n",
>>>> debug_id, fp->type);
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc
>>>> *proc,
>>>> case BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE: {
>>>> struct binder_ref *ref = binder_get_ref(proc,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> if (ref == NULL) {
>>>> - binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with invalid handle, %ld\n",
>>>> + binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with invalid handle, %d\n",
>>>> proc->pid,
>>>> thread->pid,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
>>>> @@ -1590,13 +1590,13 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc
>>>> *proc,
>>>>
>>>> if (reply) {
>>>> if (!(in_reply_to->flags &
>>>> TF_ACCEPT_FDS)) {
>>>> - binder_user_error("%d:%d got
>>>> reply with fd, %ld, but target does not allow fds\n",
>>>> + binder_user_error("%d:%d got
>>>> reply with fd, %d, but target does not allow fds\n",
>>>> proc->pid, thread->pid,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
>>>> goto err_fd_not_allowed;
>>>> }
>>>> } else if (!target_node->accept_fds) {
>>>> - binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with fd, %ld, but target does not allow fds\n",
>>>> + binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with fd, %d, but target does not allow fds\n",
>>>> proc->pid, thread->pid,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
>>>> goto err_fd_not_allowed;
>>>> @@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc
>>>> *proc,
>>>>
>>>> file = fget(fp->handle);
>>>> if (file == NULL) {
>>>> - binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with invalid fd, %ld\n",
>>>> + binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction
>>>> with invalid fd, %d\n",
>>>> proc->pid, thread->pid,
>>>> fp->handle);
>>>> return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
>>>> goto err_fget_failed;
>>>> @@ -1618,13 +1618,13 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc
>>>> *proc,
>>>> task_fd_install(target_proc, target_fd, file);
>>>> trace_binder_transaction_fd(t, fp->handle,
>>>> target_fd);
>>>> binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_TRANSACTION,
>>>> - " fd %ld -> %d\n",
>>>> fp->handle, target_fd);
>>>> + " fd %d -> %d\n", fp->handle,
>>>> target_fd);
>>>> /* TODO: fput? */
>>>> fp->handle = target_fd;
>>>> } break;
>>>>
>>>> default:
>>>> - binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction with
>>>> invalid object type, %lx\n",
>>>> + binder_user_error("%d:%d got transaction with
>>>> invalid object type, %x\n",
>>>> proc->pid, thread->pid, fp->type);
>>>> return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
>>>> goto err_bad_object_type;
>>>> @@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ static long binder_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>>>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>>> goto err;
>>>> }
>>>> binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_READ_WRITE,
>>>> - "%d:%d write %zd at %08lx, read %zd at
>>>> %08lx\n",
>>>> + "%d:%d write %zd at %016lx, read %zd at
>>>> %016lx\n",
>>>> proc->pid, thread->pid, bwr.write_size,
>>>> bwr.write_buffer, bwr.read_size,
>>>> bwr.read_buffer);
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/binder.h
>>>> b/drivers/staging/android/binder.h
>>>> index edab249..2f94d16 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/binder.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/binder.h
>>>> @@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ enum {
>>>> */
>>>> struct flat_binder_object {
>>>> /* 8 bytes for large_flat_header. */
>>>> - unsigned long type;
>>>> - unsigned long flags;
>>>> + __u32 type;
>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>>
>>>> /* 8 bytes of data. */
>>>> union {
>>>> void __user *binder; /* local object */
>>>> - signed long handle; /* remote object */
>>>> + __s32 handle; /* remote object */
>>>
>>>
>>> This should be unsigned to match the handle in binder_transaction_data
>>> and other uses in the driver, but it is currently also used to pass
>>> file descriptors. Perhaps this is better (if sou also change size of
>>> the handle in binder_transaction_data to match):
>>> __u32 handle; /* remote object */
>>> __s32 fd; /* file descriptor */
>>
>>
>> I will add this union and fix any uses of remote object/ file descriptor
>> accordingly.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* extra data associated with local object */
>>>> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct binder_write_read {
>>>> /* Use with BINDER_VERSION, driver fills in fields. */
>>>> struct binder_version {
>>>> /* driver protocol version -- increment with incompatible change
>>>> */
>>>> - signed long protocol_version;
>>>> + __s32 protocol_version;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* This is the current protocol version. */
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>
>>>
>>> I still think the protocol_version size change on 64 bit systems
>>> should go after all your other changes that affect 64 bits systems.
>>> That way you don't have to change the protocol version later.
>>
>> At the end of this patch set we will have support for 32/32 and 64/64 binder
>> calls. This patch does not add compat support for 64/32 systems and will not
>> work for this configuration.
>>
>> However until we add:
>>
>>> static const struct file_operations binder_fops = {
>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> .poll = binder_poll,
>>> .unlocked_ioctl = binder_ioctl,
>>> + .compat_ioctl = binder_ioctl,
>>> .mmap = binder_mmap,
>>> .open = binder_open,
>>> .flush = binder_flush,
>>
>>
>> The return value for any binder ioctl from a 32bit userspace running on top
>> of a 64bit kernel will be EINVAL (this happens only for 64/32 systems). Once
>> we have the compat layer upstreamed we will add the above change, but until
>> that point querying the binder version or any other binder iocall will fail
>> (on 64/32).
>>
>> Let me know if you consider that changing the binder version to use __s32
>> when adding the compat layer would be better.
>>
>
> If the ioctl fails on for a 32 bit process on a 64 bit kernel, you can
> change the size before adding the compat_ioctl, but you need to finish
> all the changes that affect a 64/64 system first. You can either split
> this change in two or move the entire change to the end of your
> patch-set. Can you also post your changes that add 64/32 support?

Thanks again for the feedback - I will split the binder version change
into its own patch.

I will rework my binder compat changes based on a 3.10 kernel and resend
them.

Regards,
Serban

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-05 11:21    [W:0.149 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site