lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] jfs: neatening
On 06/04/2013 06:39 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> The second patch is speculative and maybe not necessary.
>
> Is a 3KB reduction in object size when embedded and !CONFIG_PRINTK worth it?

I'm pushing the first patch to linux-next. I haven't made up my mind
about the second. I don't really consider jfs to be the filesystem of
choice for a small embedded system. Maybe something like a dvr, but then
it wouldn't be a big factor.

Thanks
Shagggy

> Joe Perches (2):
> jfs: Update jfs_error
> jfs: Reduce object size when CONFIG_PRINTK=n
>
> fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c | 37 +++++++++++++-------------
> fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c | 2 +-
> fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 5 ++--
> fs/jfs/jfs_superblock.h | 17 +++++++++++-
> fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 2 +-
> fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +-
> fs/jfs/resize.c | 2 +-
> fs/jfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++-------
> fs/jfs/xattr.c | 4 +--
> 12 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-05 23:01    [W:0.029 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site