lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 net-next 2/7] net: add low latency socket poll
From
Date
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 18:30 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 18:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 13:34 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is probably too big to be inlined, and nonblock should be a bool
>
>
> > It would also make sense to give end_time as a parameter, so that the
> > polling() code could really give a end_time for the whole duration of
> > poll().
> >
> > (You then should test can_poll_ll(end_time) _before_ call to
> > ndo_ll_poll())
>
> how would you handle a nonblocking operation in that case?
> I guess if we have a socket option, then we don't need to handle none
> blocking any diffrent, since the user specified exactly how much time to
> waste polling. right?

If the thread already spent 50us in the poll() system call, it for sure
should not call any ndo_ll_poll(). This makes no more sense at this
point.





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-05 18:21    [W:0.052 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site