Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:09:39 -0400 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del |
| |
On Tue, 4 June 2013 14:44:35 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote: > > Or while_list_drain?
Not sure if the silence is approval or lack of interest, but a new set of patches is posted. By playing around with the implementation a bit, I have actually found a variant that makes the object code shrink. Not one variant gave same-size object code. There's compiler optimization for you.
Jörn
-- Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever. -- John R. Mashey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |