lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:37:23PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * can_migrate_task - may task p from runqueue rq be migrated to this_cpu?
> > > > */
> > > > @@ -3945,10 +3977,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Aggressive migration if:
> > > > - * 1) task is cache cold, or
> > > > - * 2) too many balance attempts have failed.
> > > > + * 1) destination numa is preferred
> > > > + * 2) task is cache cold, or
> > > > + * 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > + if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env))
> > > > + return 1;
> > >
> > > Shouldnt this be under tsk_cache_hot check?
> > >
> > > If the task is cache hot, then we would have to update the corresponding schedstat
> > > metrics.
> >
> > No; you want migrate_degrades_locality() to be like task_hot(). You want
> > to _always_ migrate tasks towards better locality irrespective of local
> > cache hotness.
> >
>
> Yes, I understand that numa should have more priority over cache.
> But the schedstats will not be updated about whether the task was hot or
> cold.
>
> So lets say the task was cache hot but numa wants it to move, then we
> should certainly move it but we should update the schedstats to mention that we
> moved a cache hot task.
>
> Something akin to this.
>
> tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env->src_rq->clock_task, env->sd);
> if (tsk_cache_hot) {
> if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env) ||
> (env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
> schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
> #endif
> return 1;
> }
> schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_failed_migrations_hot);
> return 0;
> }
> return 1;
>

Thanks. Is this acceptable?

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b3848e0..c3a153e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4088,8 +4088,13 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
*/

- if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env))
+ if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
+ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
+ schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
+#endif
return 1;
+ }

tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env->src_rq->clock_task, env->sd);
if (!tsk_cache_hot)
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-28 16:21    [W:0.071 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site