lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] PCI: acpiphp: look _RMV method a bit deeper in the hierarhcy
From
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:15:47PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mika Westerberg
>> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:

[]

>> > +static acpi_status pcihp_evaluate_rmv(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
>> > + void *context, void **return_not_used)
>> > +{
>> > + unsigned long long *removable = context;
>> > + unsigned long long value;
>> > + acpi_status status;
>> > +
>> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RMV", NULL, &value);
>> > + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && value) {
>>
>> So, there is a chance the caller gets back uninitialized *context.
>> Let's assume that is by design.
>>
>> > + *removable = value;
>> > + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>> > + }
>> > + return AE_OK;
>> > +}
>>
>>
>> > +static bool pcihp_is_removable(acpi_handle handle, size_t depth)
>> > +{
>> > + unsigned long long removable = 0;
>> > + acpi_status status;
>> > +
>> > + status = pcihp_evaluate_rmv(handle, 0, &removable, NULL);
>> > + if ((status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) && removable)
>>
>> Here you already have removable not equal zero.
>
> Hmm, removable is initialized to zero just few lines above... Did I miss
> something obvious?

Yes, that's correct, however, you already did this check when you call
evaluate_rmv. Thus, second check '&& removable' is not needed.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-25 21:41    [W:0.194 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site