lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() in perf_trace_##call() when possible
From
Date
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:12 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > Or is this your way to confuse me as much as my code has confused
> > you? ;-)
>
> Of course! this was the main reason.

I knew it!

>
>
> Steven, I convinced myself the patch should be correct. If you agree with
> this hack:
>
> - anything else I should do apart from the change above?
>
> - should I resend the previous "[PATCH 0/3] tracing: more
> list_empty(perf_events) checks" series?
>
> This series depends on "[PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Move the
> PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE check into perf_trace_buf_prepare()".
>
> Or I can drop this patch if you do not like it and rediff.
>
> Just in case, there are other pending patches in trace_kprobe.c
> which I am going to resend, but they are orthogonal.

I'll pull in the patches and play with them. I'll let you know what I
find.

Thanks,


-- Steve




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-19 21:21    [W:0.057 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site