lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a separate header
    Hi Linus,

    On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
    > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
    > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
    >
    > > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by
    > > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will
    > > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future.
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
    >
    > Patch applied.
    >
    > Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on
    > top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.

    Thanks for merging this.

    I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented
    on.

    > If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base
    > in v3.11 with this in place, right?

    Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for
    the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.

    Maxime

    --
    Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
    Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
    http://free-electrons.com


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-06-17 11:41    [W:2.949 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site