lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:43:52PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:39:37 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 06/10/2013 03:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:51:22PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> > > Looks good to me, but doesn't tis obsolete kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes() and
> > > sp->mmio_cached, so they should be removed as part of the patch series?
> >
> > Yes, i agree, they should be removed. :)
>
> I'm fine with removing it but please make it clear that you all agree
> on the same basis.
>
> Last time, Paolo mentioned the possibility to use some bits of spte for
> other things. The suggestion there was to keep sp->mmio_cached code
> for the time we would need to reduce the bits for generation numbers.
>
> Do you think that zap_all() is now preemptible and can treat the
> situation reasonably well as the current kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes()?
>
> One downside is the need to zap unrelated shadow pages, but if this case
> is really very rare, yes I agree, it should not be a problem: it depends
> on how many bits we can use.
>
> Just please reconfirm.
>
That was me who mention the possibility to use some bits of spte for
other things. But for now I have a use for one bit only. Now that you
have reminded me about that discussion I am not so sure we want to
remove kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes(), but on the other hand it is non
preemptable, so large number of mmio sptes can cause soft lockups.
zap_all() is better in this regards now.

--
Gleb.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-10 19:21    [W:0.060 / U:1.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site