lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Check for insane amounts of request on the ring.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.06.13 at 22:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:57:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> + /* N.B. 'rp', not 'rc'. */
> >> + if (RING_REQUEST_CONS_OVERFLOW(&blk_rings->common, rp)) {
> >> + pr_warn(DRV_PFX "Frontend provided bogus ring requests (%d - %d = %d).
> > Halting ring processing on dev=%04x\n",
> >> + rp, rc, rp - rc, blkif->vbd.pdevice);
> >
> > Hm, I seem to be able to get:
> >
> > [ 189.398095] xen-blkback:Frontend provided bogus ring requests (125 - 115 =
> > 10). Halting ring processing on dev=800011
> > or:
> > [ 478.558699] xen-blkback:Frontend provided bogus ring requests (95 - 94 =
> > 1). Halting ring processing on dev=800011
> >
> > Which is clearly wrong. Piggybacking on the rsp_prod_pvt does not seem to
> > cut it.
>
> We see that too, but not very frequently. One thing is that
> rsp_prod_pvt doesn't get printed along with rc and rp, thus
> making it not immediately obvious how this can be off in any way.
>
> Among the instance there are cases where the printed
> difference is 32, which makes me wonder whether part of the
> problem is the >= in the macro (we may want > here).
>
> And then we might have been living with some sort of issue in the
> past, because the existing use of the macro just causes the loop
> to be exited, with it getting re-entered subsequently (i.e. at worst
> causing performance issues).

My observation was that the rsp_prod_pvt was lagging behind b/c the
READ requests weren't completed. In other words, the processing
of the ring was stalled b/c 'make_response' hadn't been called yet.
Which meant that rsp_prod was not updated to rsp_prod_pvt (backend
does not care about that value, only frontend does).

Going back to the rc an rp check solves the immediate 'insane ring
check'.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-10 19:01    [W:0.063 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site