lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:38:36PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> > still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> >
> > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.
>
> What about code that depends on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME? Or code that
> depends on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but not on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME?
>
Should we also introduce __pm_sleep and __pm_runtime ?

Thanks,
Guenter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-09 20:21    [W:0.062 / U:0.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site