lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v8 11/11] Move arch/x86 reboot= handling to generic kernel.
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:50:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 09:39:55 -0500 Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Merge together the unicore32, arm, and x86 reboot= command line
> > parameter handling.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static int __init reboot_setup(char *str)
> > +{
> > + for (;;) {
> > + /*
> > + * Having anything passed on the command line via
> > + * reboot= will cause us to disable DMI checking
> > + * below.
> > + */
> > + reboot_default = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (*str) {
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> > + case 'w':
> > + reboot_mode = REBOOT_WARM;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case 'c':
> > + reboot_mode = REBOOT_COLD;
> > + break;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + case 's':
> > + if (isdigit(*(str+1))) {
> > + reboot_cpu = (int) (*(str+1) - '0');
> > + if (isdigit(*(str+2)))
> > + reboot_cpu = reboot_cpu*10 + (int)(*(str+2) - '0');
> > + }
>
> Boy, that's some weird stuff.
>
> What's wrong with doing
>
> if (isdigit(str[1])) {
> reboot_cpu = str[1] - '0';
> if (isdigit(str[2]))
> reboot_cpu = reboot_cpu * 10 +
> str[2] - '0';
> }
>
> ?
>
> But it's still nonsense - we should eliminate its
> you-have-less-than-101-CPUs restriction by using, you know, atoi().

I had an earlier version which I must have dropped which handled the
larger parsing, but I do like your suggestion of using atoi. I will
submit a -v9 in a few hours.

Robin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-09 14:01    [W:0.156 / U:1.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site