Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 May 2013 13:39:19 +0200 | Subject | Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 14/14] mm: Account for WRITEBACK_TEMP in balance_dirty_pages | From | Miklos Szeredi <> |
| |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> wrote: > I'm for accounting NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP because balance_dirty_pages is already > overcomplicated (imho) and adding new clauses for FUSE makes me sick.
Agreed.
But instead of further complexifying balance_dirty_pages() fuse specific throttling can be done in fuse_page_mkwrite(), I think.
And at that point NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP really becomes irrelevant to the dirty balancing logic.
Thanks, Miklos
| |