Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 May 2013 11:12:24 +0200 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC instead of a magic number |
| |
On 05/07/2013 11:08 AM, Liu Ying wrote: > 2013/5/7 Liu Ying <liu.y.victor@gmail.com> >> 2013/5/7 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> >>> On 05/06/2013 02:42 PM, y@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net wrote: >>>> From: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com>
>>> If you only have 1 patch, then you don't need "1/1" in the subject. >>> The term magic number here might be a little exaggerated, not so >>> magic actually. :-) >>> >> Thanks. I will update this. How about turning "magic number" to "immediate >> number"?
Maybe like ``ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC where appropriate''.
| |