[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/16] perf, persistent: Kernel updates for perf tool integration
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:32:10AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> Hmm, since the changes in the onliner patches are either hard effort
> to find in reviewing/testing or more or less related to the new
> implementation, I better prefer to keep authorship as well to document
> the code development (don't blame me about patch count ;)). We better
> should add a branch (preferable at topic branch in tip?) as soon as
> possible for this.

Yes, you should definitely keep authorship - simply state this in the
commit message, add your SOB, etc. However, I don't want to have messy
history for patches which haven't been reviewed yet. This complicates
review needlessly and makes absolutely no sense for later when you stare
at the history.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-31 15:01    [W:0.113 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site