Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 May 2013 09:58:45 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | [regression] Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Fix RLIMIT_MEMLOCK |
| |
* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Before your patch pinned was included in locked and thus RLIMIT_MEMLOCK > > had a single resource counter. After your patch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is > > applied separately to both -- more or less. > > Before the patch the count was doubled since a single page was counted > twice: Once because it was mlocked (marked with PG_mlock) and then again > because it was also pinned (the refcount was increased). Two different > things.
Christoph, why are you *STILL* arguing??
You caused a *regression* in a userspace ABI plain and simple, and a security relevant one. Furtermore you modified kernel/events/core.c yet you never even Cc:-ed the parties involved ...
All your excuses, obfuscation and attempts to redefine the universe to your liking won't change reality: it worked before, it does not now. Take responsibility for your action for christ's sake and move forward towards a resolution , okay?
When can we expect a fix from you for the breakage you caused? Or at least a word that acknowledges that you broke a user ABI carelessly?
Thanks,
Ingo
| |