Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 May 2013 17:24:06 +0300 | From | Andrii Tseglytskyi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] PM / AVS: SmartReflex: disable errgen before vpbound disable |
| |
On 05/29/2013 12:58 PM, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks a lot for your comments. > > On 05/28/2013 09:45 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@ti.com> writes: >> >>> From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> >>> >>> vpboundsintr_en is available inside the IP block as an re-sycned >>> version and one which is not. Due to this, there is an 1 sysclk >>> cycle window where interruptz could be asserted low for 1 cycle. >> ^^^ >> >> Is that the way the cool kidz are spelling interrupts these days? ;) > > Oh! Shame on me. Thank you for catching this :)
Shame on me again (((. Name "interruptz" is more less OK. This is the name of signal between Voltage Processor and SmartReflex. In documentation it is referenced as "SR_SInterruptz". Anyway commit message should be updated to make this more clear.
[snip] > >
Regards, Andrii
| |