Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 May 2013 16:41:08 +0300 | From | Eliezer Tamir <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] net: add napi_id and hash |
| |
On 28/05/2013 16:38, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 11:03 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > >> With an atomic we don't need the RTNL in any of the napi_id functions. >> One less thing to worry about when we try to remove the RTNL. > > OK but we'll need something to protect the lists against concurrent > insert/deletes. > > A spinlock or a mutex.
OK
| |