lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4 12/39] thp, mm: rewrite add_to_page_cache_locked() to support huge pages
Date
Dave Hansen wrote:
> You could create a hpagecache_nr_pages() helper or something I guess.

Makes sense.
>
> >>> + }
> >>> + __mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_FILE_PAGES, nr);
> >>> + if (PageTransHuge(page))
> >>> + __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES);
> >>> + mapping->nrpages += nr;
> >>> + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> >>> + radix_tree_preload_end();
> >>> + trace_mm_filemap_add_to_page_cache(page);
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +err:
> >>> + if (i != 0)
> >>> + error = -ENOSPC; /* no space for a huge page */
> >>> + page_cache_release(page + i);
> >>> + page[i].mapping = NULL;
> >>
> >> I guess it's a slight behaviour change (I think it's harmless) but if
> >> you delay doing the page_cache_get() and page[i].mapping= until after
> >> the radix tree insertion, you can avoid these two lines.
> >
> > Hm. I don't think it's safe. The spinlock protects radix-tree against
> > modification, but find_get_page() can see it just after
> > radix_tree_insert().
>
> Except that the mapping->tree_lock is still held. I don't think
> find_get_page() can find it in the radix tree without taking the lock.

It can. Lookup is rcu-protected. ->tree_lock is only for add/delete/replace.

>
> > The page is locked and IIUC never uptodate at this point, so nobody will
> > be able to do much with it, but leave it without valid ->mapping is a bad
> > idea.
>
> ->mapping changes are protected by lock_page(). You can't keep
> ->mapping stable without holding it. If you unlock_page(), you have to
> recheck ->mapping after you reacquire the lock.
>
> In other words, I think the code is fine.

You are right.

>
> >> I'm also trying to figure out how and when you'd actually have to unroll
> >> a partial-huge-page worth of radix_tree_insert(). In the small-page
> >> case, you can collide with another guy inserting in to the page cache.
> >> But, can that happen in the _middle_ of a THP?
> >
> > E.g. if you enable THP after some uptime, the mapping can contain small pages
> > already.
> > Or if a process map the file with bad alignement (MAP_FIXED) and touch the
> > area, it will get small pages.
>
> Could you put a comment in explaining this case a bit? It's a bit subtle.

okay.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-28 14:21    [W:0.849 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site